The significance of the maxillary sinus volume for planning subantral augmentation and dental implantation (part II)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

When planning implant surgery, preceded by sinus lift, it is necessary to study the anatomical and topographic features of the maxillary sinus, specifically its volume, shape, type of pneumatization, the presence of internal bony septa in the sinus floor, and the volume of bone tissue located above the apices of the maxillary teeth.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the volume of the maxillary sinus in men and women of different age groups depending on the composition of the dentition by sectioning skeletonized skulls. A total of 254 certified skulls were examined. Subjects were divided into age groups (25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65 years and older) and groups based on the presence and/or absence of chewing teeth, excluding third molars.

Research methodology: The 254 skeletonized skulls studied were also divided into three groups: the first included 48 skulls with premolars and molars; the second included 148 skulls with at least one missing premolar and/or molar; and the third included 58 skulls with no premolars or molars. A window was cut into the anterior wall of the sinus in the fossa canina region using a micromotor and a carbide bur to better visualize the internal surface of the maxillary sinus. The width, depth, and height of the maxillary sinus were measured, and the volume of the maxillary sinus was then calculated. Cone-beam computed tomography of the skeletonized skulls was also performed, along with measurements of the width, depth, and height of the sinus and a calculation of its volume.

Results of determining the average maxillary sinus volume on dry specimens showed that the largest sinus volume was also observed in men aged 55-64 years, while the smallest was observed in men aged 45–54 years in all three groups, depending on the presence and/or absence of molars in the upper jaw. The sinus volume on the right was larger than on the left in most cases. The loss of molars increases the volume of the maxillary sinus.

作者简介

Irina Gatilo

Stavropol State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: chijgay@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0139-5094

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Hygiene named after G.A. Gudzovsky

俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol

Sergey Sirak

Stavropol State Medical University

Email: sergejsirak@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4924-5792

MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Dentistry

俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol

Vadim Lenev

Stavropol State Medical University

Email: lenevadim@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-5738-5501

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol

Nikolay Budzinsky

Stavropol State Medical University

Email: n22948121@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-1224-1575

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol

Andrey Yurasov

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: andreyyr@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-1663-3377

Assistant Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry

俄罗斯联邦, Ufa

参考

  1. Zhang Y., Li, J., Wang S. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume changes after sinus floor elevation: a CBCT study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2023;34(2): 150–158. doi: 10.1111/clr.13987.
  2. Kim H. J., Lee S. J., Park J. H. Influence of maxillary sinus anatomy on the outcome of sinus augmentation: a retrospective CBCT analysis. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2022;52(1):45–54. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2105310265.
  3. Silva R.A., Costa F.O., de Oliveira R.C. Maxillary sinus volume and its correlation with residual ridge height in edentulous patients: a CBCT study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021;50(7): 924–930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.007.
  4. Patel N., Singh A. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in planning sinus lift procedures: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2020;46(4): 335–342. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00058.
  5. Garcia R.C., de Souza A. P. Anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus and their impact on sinus lift surgery: a CBCT study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2020;22(3):314–320. doi: 10.1111/cid.12816.
  6. Müller F., Schmidt A. Correlation between maxillary sinus pneumatization and alveolar bone height: implications for implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021;25(3): 1235–1242. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03587-3.
  7. Chen L., Zhang X. Impact of maxillary sinus volume on the success rate of dental implants placed with sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis. Implant Dentistry. 2022;31(5):505–512. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000001311.
  8. Rossi F., Bianchi A. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary sinus volume and its clinical relevance for sinus floor elevation. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;47(5):720–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.008.
  9. Wang C., Liu Y. Personalized planning of sinus augmentation based on CBCT volumetric analysis: a clinical study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2023;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00413-7.
  10. Silva T.M., Pereira F.S. Maxillary sinus volume changes after tooth loss and implications for implant planning. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2020;31(9):834–841. doi: 10.1111/clr.13645.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Gatilo I.A., Sirak S.V., Lenev V.N., Budzinsky N.E., Yurasov A.Y., 2025

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).