Autonomy and care in the logic of competing and solidarity relations in medicine

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The interactions of the subjects of medicine are considered in the projection of two logics: solidary and competing relations. This approach develops the critique of the dominance of the concept of patient autonomy that comes with the bioethics represented in the ethics of care by K. Dörner, A. Moll and others. The conceptual forms of competition and solidarity are identified as oppositions to power and equality, autonomy and care, individualism and interdependence of subjects of medicine, anti-paternalism and paternalism, neglect and attentiveness, the legal and ethical meaning of informed consent, control and compliance, medical services and medical care.

In medicine, from point of view of bioethics, the solidary relations could be expressed in a paternalistic model. It is based on ethical connotations such as doctor's responsibility and mutual trust. Autonomy has a legal and economic predication. The ethics of care, traditional for the Russian cultural model, implies not so much the doctor's authorities over the patient, recognizing him as unequal in medical decisions, but in modern healthcare it can be combined with a voluntary expression of consent to medical interventions with the properly provided information.

作者简介

Tatyana Sidorova

Novosibirsk State National Research University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: t.sidorova@g.ngu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8985-092X
Researcher ID: AAX-2059-2021

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamental Medicine, Institute for Medicine and Psychology

俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk

参考

  1. Veatch R.M. Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict. Theoretical Medicine and Bioeth-ics Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice. 2012;33(1).
  2. Siluyanova I. V. Selected. About calling a doctor. Mos-cow: Publishing house of Forma LLC, 2008. 256 p. (in Rus.).
  3. Starobinets A.A. Look at him. Moscow, AST Publ., 2017. 115 p. (in Rus.).
  4. Vitch R. Models of moral medicine in the era of revolu-tionary changes. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philos-ophy. 1994;3:67–72. (in Rus.).
  5. Ivanyushkin A.Ya. Bioethics and psychiatry. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 1994;3:77–90. (in Rus.).
  6. Yastrebov V.S. Organization of Psychiatric Care: A His-torical Sketch. Rukovodstvo po psikhiatrii = Guide to Psychiatry. Ed. A.S. Tiganova. Moscow: Medicine, 1999. Vol. 1. 712 p. (in Rus.).
  7. Lekhtsiyer V.L. The logic of care versus the logic of choice in modern concepts of medical practice. Inter-aktsiya. Interv'yu. Interpretatsiya = Interaction. Inter-view. Interpretation. 2019;11(20):36–53. (in Rus.).
  8. Sidorova T.A., Zhichina Ye.Yu. Bioethical Content of Informed Voluntary Consent. Meditsinskoye pravo: te-oriya i praktika = Medical Law: Theory and Practice. 2016;2(1):239–244. (in Rus.).
  9. Tronto J.C. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. NY: Routledge, 1993.
  10. Mol A. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge; New York, 2008. 129 p.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Sidorova T.A., 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).