Development of ideas about tactile interaction: from Aristotle to the present day
- Authors: Leontyeva D.V.1, Belovol E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Pedagogical University
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 158 - 165
- Section: PSYCHOLOGY
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2307-6127/article/view/359824
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2025-6-158-165
- ID: 359824
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article explores the evolution of concepts related to tactile interaction as a fundamental element of human embodiment, perception, and communication. It investigates how touch has been interpreted across historical periods—from a basic physiological function to a complex process deeply embedded in emotional regulation, personal identity, and social integration. The analysis incorporates philosophical perspectives on bodily experience, psychological theories that examine the role of tactile stimuli in human development, and recent neuroscientific findings on the functioning of sensory systems involved in touch. Emphasis is placed on the transformative nature of tactile contact in building a sense of safety, empathy, and interpersonal trust. The study addresses how cultural practices and social norms shape tactile behavior and how the reduction of physical contact in the digital era affects human interaction. As communication increasingly occurs in virtual environments, the loss of real touch raises critical concerns about emotional isolation and sensory deprivation. The article underscores the necessity of preserving embodied experience and rethinking the function of tactile interactions in education, therapy, and everyday social life. The shift toward digital and technologically mediated relationships makes the human body more abstract and potentially disconnected from authentic sensory feedback. Through an interdisciplinary lens combining philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, and cultural studies, the article argues for the ongoing relevance of tactile engagement in maintaining psychological well-being and fostering meaningful human connection. The conclusion is made about the need to preserve bodily experience as an important factor in emotional and social regulation in changing technological conditions.
About the authors
Darya Viktorovna Leontyeva
Moscow State Pedagogical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: leonteva99_99@mail.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation
Elena Vladimirovna Belovol
Moscow State Pedagogical University
Email: belovol@mail.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Aristotel’. O dushe [On the Soul]. Sochineniya: v 4 tomakh [Works: in 4 volumes]. Ed. V.F. Asmus. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1976. Vol. 1. Pp. 368–448 (in Russian).
- Platon. Fedon [Phaedo]. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 4 tomakh [Collected Works: in 4 volumes]. Ed. A.F. Losev. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1994. Vol. 2. Pp.7–96 (in Russian).
- Goff Zh. Istoriya tela v sredniye vaka [History of the Body in the Middle Ages]. Translation from French by E. Lebedeva. Moscow, Tekst Publ., 2008. 189 p. (in Russian).
- Zamoshanskiy I.I., Kashperskiy V.I. Chelovek i ego telo v antichnoy kul’ture [Man and His Body in Ancient Culture]. Vestnik RGGU – RSUH/RGGU Bulletin, 2010, no. 5, pp. 112–125 (in Russian).
- Takho-Godi A.A. Grecheskaya kul’tura [Greek Culture]. Grecheskaya kul’tura v mifakh, simvolakh i terminakh [Greek culture in myths, symbols and terms]. Ed. A.A. Takho-Godi. Saint Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 1999. Pp. 12–56 (in Russian).
- Dekart R. Razmyshleniya o pervoy filosofii [Meditations on First Philosophy]. Sochineniya: v 2 tomakh [Works: in 2 volumes]. Ed. V.V. Sokolov. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1989. Vol. 1. Pp. 7–76 (in Russian).
- Delez Zh. Spinoza: prakticheskaya filosofiya [Spinoza: Practical Philosophy]. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Kanta: ucheniye o sposobnostyakh. Bergsonizm. Spinoza [Kant’s Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of Capacities. Bergsonism. Spinoza]. Translation from French by Ya.I. Svirskiy. Moscow, PER-SE Publ., 2000. Pp. 197–351 (in Russian).
- Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason]. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 6 tomakh [Collected Works: in 6 volumes]. Ed. A.V. Gulyga. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1964. Vol. 3. Pp. 13–679 (in Russian).
- Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra [Thus Spoke Zarathustra]. Translation from German by Yu.M. Antonovskiy. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007. 512 p. (in Russian).
- Marks K., Engel’s F. Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii [Manifesto of the Communist Party]. Translation from German by V.D. Bonch-Bruevich. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1977. 64 p. (in Russian).
- Gusserrl’ E. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy]. Translation from German by A.V. Mikhaylov. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2009. 486 p. (in Russian).
- Merlo-Ponti M. Oko i dukh [Eye and Mind]. Translation from French by A.V. Gustyr’. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1992. 63 p. (in Russian).
- Bodriyyar Zh. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktury [The Consumer Society: Its Myths and Structures]. Translation from French by E.A. Samarskaya. Moscow, Respublika; Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2006. 269 p. (in Russian).
- Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdeniye tyur’my [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison]. Translation from French by V. Naumov. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1999. 478 p. (in Russian).
- Delez Zh. Logika smysla [The Logic of Sense]. Translation from French by Ya.I. Svirskiy. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2011. 472 p. (in Russian).
- Rubinshteyn S.L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Pub, 1976. 416 p. (in Russian).
- Leont’ev A.N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznaniye. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personalit]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975. 304 p. (in Russian).
- Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1969. 428 p.
- Harlow H.F., Zimmermann R.R. The development of affective responsiveness in infant monkeys. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1958, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 501–509.
- Spitz R.A. Hospitalism; an Inquiry Into the Genesis of Psychiatric Conditions in Early Childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1945. Vol. 1. Pp. 53–74.
- Watson J.B. Psychological Care of the Infant and Child. New York, Norton, 1928. 195 p.
- Walker S.C., McGlone F.P. The social brain: neurobiological basis of affiliative behaviours and psychological well-being. Neuropeptides, 2013, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 379–393.
- McGlone F., Wessberg J., Olausson H. Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling. Neuron, 2014, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 737–755.
- Belovol E.V., Shurupova E.Yu. S-taktil’nye kontakty kak faktor formirovaniya sotsial’nogo mozga lichnosti [C-Tactile Contacts as a Factor in the Formation of the Social Brain of a Personality]. Anan’evskiye chteniya – 2024. 80 let obshchey psikhologii v Sankt-Peterburgskom gosudarstvennom universitete: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Ananyev Readings – 2024. 80 Years of General Psychology at St. Petersburg State University: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference]. Ed. S.N. Kostromina, A.E. Lovyagina; V.I. Prusakov. Nizhniy Novgorod, Kirillitsa Publ., 2024. Pp. 136–143 (in Russian).
- Bykhovskaya I.M. Homo somáticos: aksiologiya chelovecheskogo tela [Homo Somáticos: Axiology of the Human Body]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2000. 208 p. (in Russian).
- Beskova I.A. Telesnost’ kak epistemologicheskiy fenomen [Corporeality as an Epistemological Phenomenon]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2009. 231 p. (in Russian).
- Podoroga V.A. Fenomenologiya tela. Vvedeniye v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [Phenomenology of the Body: Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1995. 339 p. (in Russian).
Supplementary files


