A personalized approach to current antiplatelet therapy strategies
- Authors: Cherkashin D.V.1, Grishaev S.L.1, Alanichev A.E.1, Sobolev A.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Issue: Vol 27, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 569-578
- Section: Review
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/1682-7392/article/view/363045
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/brmma657495
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LBTWIG
- ID: 363045
Cite item
Abstract
Antiplatelet therapy, which consists primarily of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and P2Y12 receptor antagonists, is one of the most commonly prescribed treatments in current clinical practice, because of the steadily increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease and the related high mortality rates. Antiplatelet agents are valuable tools for physicians because they can prevent atherothrombotic events, improve clinical outcomes, and reduce cardiovascular mortality rates in primary and secondary prevention. However, secondary bleeding remains a concern with antiplatelet therapy. The current goal of medical science is to minimize bleeding risk in patients at high risk for hemorrhagic events. This review presents data on antiplatelet drugs used in real-world clinical practice. It provides detailed, comprehensive descriptions of their use in various situations and highlights strategies for switching between them. The review also discusses the consequences of high residual platelet reactivity after treatment and summarizes current trends in patient-centered medicine. Additionally, the work revealed the high potential for developing effective and safe agents to counteract the effects of antiplatelet agents. New antiplatelet agents are being developed, such as selatogrel, revacept, and glenzocimab. Further research is required to understand how these potential new agents will integrate into the current antiplatelet therapy paradigm and whether they will promote safer clinical practices. Although significant advances in optimizing antiplatelet therapy have been made through clinical studies, more work is yet to be done. Most genetic intervention studies focus on CYP2C19 polymorphisms in order to personalize antiplatelet treatment strategies.
About the authors
Dmitriy V. Cherkashin
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1363-6860
SPIN-code: 2781-9507
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgSergei L. Grishaev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4830-5220
SPIN-code: 3854-1566
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAndrey E. Alanichev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4135-5815
SPIN-code: 6223-7758
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAlexey D. Sobolev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-5812-9669
SPIN-code: 3831-6584
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 EDN: CYGUZE
- Nagelschmitz J, Blunck M, Kraetzschmar J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid after intravenous and oral administration to healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Adv Appl. 2014;6:51–59. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S47895
- Vivas D, Martín A, Bernardo E, et al. Impact of intravenous lysine acetylsalicylate versus oral aspirin on prasugrel-inhibited platelets: results of a prospective, randomized, crossover study (the ECCLIPSE trial). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(5):e002281. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002281
- Bretagne JF, Feuillu A, Gosselin M, et al. Aspirin and gastroduodenal toxicity. A double-blind endoscopic study of the effects of placebo, aspirin and lysine acetylsalicylate in healthy subjects. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1984;8(1):28–32.
- Kimura K, Kimura T, Ishihara M, et al. JCS 2018 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Circ J. 2019;83(5):1085–1196. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0133 EDN: JMDZPT
- Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213–260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx638 EDN: YFEHNR
- Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71 EDN: EDHEHH
- Rothwell PM, Algra A, Chen Z, et al. Effects of aspirin on risk and severity of early recurrent stroke after transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: time-course analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):365–375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30468-8 EDN: YWKOEZ
- Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Mavronasiou E, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2211–2216. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2510 EDN: YDONEB
- Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A, Menichelli M, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes mellitus. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(19):2238–2247. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.032 EDN: PCEVYB
- Wen M, Li Y, Qu X, et al. Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01603-0 EDN: VYHYEW
- Valgimigli M, Gragnano F, Branca M, et al. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;373:n1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1332 EDN: HTDSUD
- Angiolillo DJ, Firstenberg MS, Price MJ, et al. Bridging antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;307(3):265–274. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.2002
- Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1303–1313. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300815 EDN: YZMMUP
- Mehta SR, Bainey KR, Cantor WJ, et al. 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology focused update of the guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(3):214–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.012 EDN: YFXKNN
- January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125–e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665 EDN: GEEHMC
- Saito Y, Kobayashi Y. Update on antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Intern Med. 2020;59(3):311–321. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3685-19 EDN: HZVMHD
- Angiolillo DJ, Goodman SG, Bhatt DL, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a North American perspective-2018 update. Circulation. 2018;138(5):527–536. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034722 EDN: POTCIK
- Sacco RL, Diener H-C, Yusuf S, et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1238–1251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002 EDN: LKWGHX
- De Luca G, Savonitto S, van't Hof AWJ, et al. Platelet GP IIb-IIIa receptor antagonists in primary angioplasty: back to the future. Drugs. 2015;75(11):1229–1253. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0425-7 EDN: UPZANV
- Muñiz-Lozano A, Rollini F, Franchi F, et al. Update on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: recommendations for clinical practice. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;7:197–213. doi: 10.1177/1753944713487781
- Franchi F, Rollini F, Park Y, et al. Platelet thrombin receptor antagonism with vorapaxar: pharmacology and clinical trial development. Future Cardiol. 2015;11(5):547–564. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.50 EDN: VEWHYV
- Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP, et al. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1404–1413. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200933 EDN: PIHBYJ
- Grant SM, Goa KL. Iloprost: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in peripheral vascular disease, myocardial ischaemia and extracorporeal circulation procedures. Drugs. 1992;43(6):889–924. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199243060-00008 EDN: XXVOGM
- Gresele P, Momi S, Falcinelli E. Anti-platelet therapy: phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72(4):634–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04034.x EDN: PIHATZ
- Noma K, Higashi Y. Cilostazol for treatment of cerebral infarction. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(15):1719–1726. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1515199 EDN: VJBCOC
- Goto F, Tohgi H, Hirai S, et al. Cilostazol stroke prevention study: a placebo-controlled double-blind trial for secondary prevention of cerebral infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;9(4):147–157. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2000.7216
- Shinohara Y, Katayama Y, Uchiyama S, et al. Cilostazol for prevention of secondary stroke (CSPS 2): an aspirin-controlled, double-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(10):959–968. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70198-8 EDN: NATKVL
- Huang Y, Cheng Y, Wu J, et al. Cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin after ischaemic stroke: a randomised, double-blind, pilot study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(6):494–499. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70094-2
- Sahara N, Kuwashiro T, Okada Y. Cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack. Nihon Rinsho. 2016;74(4):666–670.
- Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, et al. International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies. Circulation. 2017;136(20):1955–1975. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164 EDN: YLKAGB
- Mehta SR, Bainey KR, Cantor WJ, et al. 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology focused update of the guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(3):214–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.012 EDN: YFXKNN
- O'Connor CT, Kiernan TJ, Yan BP. The genetic basis of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy: a pharmacogenetic review of newer antiplatelets (clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) and anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban). Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(7):725–739. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1338274 EDN: YILWLP
- Lordkipanidzé M, Diodati JG, Palisaitis DA, et al. Genetic determinants of response to aspirin: appraisal of 4 candidate genes. Thromb Res. 2011;128(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.02.019
- Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood. 2006;108(7):2244–2247. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-013052
- Strom CM, Goos D, Crossley B, et al. Testing for variants in CYP2C19: population frequencies and testing experience in a clinical laboratory. Genet Med. 2012;14(1):95–100. doi: 10.1038/gim.0b013e3182329870
- Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(3):317–323. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.105
- Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, et al. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(12):913–958. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241120-00002 EDN: NLDWOP
- Gower MN, Ratner LR, Williams AK, et al. Clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients at risk of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: a review of emerging evidence. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020;13:239–252. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S231475 EDN: RKPRUR
- Hulot JS, Wuerzner G, Bachelot-Loza C, et al. Effect of an increased clopidogrel maintenance dose or lansoprazole co-administration on the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel in CYP2C19-genotyped healthy subjects. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(3):610–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03729.x
- Collet JP, Hulot JS, Anzaha G, et al. High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):392–402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.002
- Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(4):363–375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808227
- Pereira NL, Farkouh ME, So D, et al. Effect of genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor selection vs conventional clopidogrel therapy on ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the TAILOR-PCI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(8):761–771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12443 EDN: NQPQVP
- Barbarash OL, Karpov YA, Panov AV, et al. 2024 clinical practice guidelines for stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):6110. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6110 EDN: HHJJUT
- Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e574–e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823a5596 EDN: SPNVAR
Supplementary files

