The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: A Sociological Approach

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: to create effective mechanisms for state regulation of potential moral challenges caused by the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, it is of practical interest to study the attitude of society to this problem. The purpose of the work is a sociological analysis of the attitude of the Russian society to the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive analysis of data from open access databases of All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion was carried out. The materials of sociological surveys for the period 2007 to 2023 were used. Data weighted by socio-demographic parameters.

Results: The majority of respondents believe that AI cannot completely replace humans (78 %). The greatest fears of the population (noted by 50–65 % of respondents) are associated with the loss of personal data and violation of privacy boundaries, the loss of personal responsibility for erroneous actions. Every third noted the risks of violation of civil rights and social guarantees ("increases inequality", "violates the balance of interests of society and the individual"), potential ethical problems ("artificial intelligence has no morals and ethics" – 32 %).

Conclusion: Distrust of AI technologies is associated with an understanding of the social risks of their integration and an awareness of the loss of human values of communication, creativity, and individuality. Particular risks in this context are presented for social institutions of education and healthcare, where the loss of interpersonal communication calls into question the manifestation of empathy, sympathy and compassion.

About the authors

Alena D. Donika

Volgograd State Medical University; Volgograd Medical Research Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: addonika@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3905-5538
Scopus Author ID: 57190221899

Doctor of Science (Sociology), Professor, Senior Researcher of Ethical, judicial and sociological expertise in medicine Department

Russian Federation, Volgograd; Volgograd

References

  1. Leushina V.V., Karpov V.E. The ethics of artifi-cial intelligence. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Phi-losophy and society. 2022;3:124–140. (in Rus.) doi: 10.30884/jfio/2022.03.07.
  2. Karimov A.R., Khort M.G. Modern challenges in the ethics of artificial intelligence. International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2023:2:344–349. (in Rus.) doi: 10.24412/2181-1385-2023-2-344-349.
  3. Constantinescu M., Voinea C., Uszkai R., Vică C. Understanding responsibility in responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context. Ethics and Information Technology. 2021;23:803–814.
  4. Hallamaa J., Kalliokoski T. How AI systems challenge the conditions of moral agency? Inter-national conference on human-computer interac-tion. Springer, Berlin, 2020:54–64.
  5. Wallach W., Vallor S. Moral machine: from value alignment to embodied virtue. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Liao M (Ed). Oxford University Press, New York, NYC, 2020:383–412.
  6. Nazarova Yu.V., Kashirin A.Yu. Dilemmas of the ethics of artificial intelligence. Gumanitarnyye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo. 2020;4(36):23–31. (in Rus.) doi: 10.22405/ 2304-4772-2020-1-4-23-31.
  7. Eremina M.V. Social group "65+": the ethical di-lemma of the pandemic. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2022;15(1):46–50. (in Rus.).
  8. Filippov A.V. Pandemic Lessons: Safety Ethics. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2021;1(27):32–35. (in Rus.).
  9. Sedova N.N. Bioethics in an era of change: vul-nerable groups. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2022;15(1):3–5. (in Rus.).
  10. Sedova N.N. Ethical expertise in medicine: from humanism to formalism. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2022;15(2):6–11. (in Rus.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Rice. 1. Assessing the population’s interest in science and technology over the course of 2007–2023. The y-axis is the number of respondents as a percentage. On the abscissa axis – answer options

Download (134KB)
3. Rice. 2. The structure of Russians’ distrust of artificial intelligence technologies. Along the y-axis are possible answers to the question: “Why exactly do you not trust artificial intelligence technologies?” X-axis: number of respondents as a percentage

Download (362KB)
4. Rice. 3. Expectations of the population of social risks of introducing artificial intelligence technologies. On the y-axis are options for answers to the question: “Do you think the development of artificial intelligence technologies has negative consequences or does not have any? If so, which of the listed negative consequences cause you the most concern? X-axis: number of respondents as a percentage

Download (292KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Donika A.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).