Ethical risks of deviation of the culture of consumption of AI-associated services in medicine

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: the integration of artificial intelligence technologies into the medical field is happening at a rapid pace, which certainly contributes to the qualitative growth of high-tech medical services. At the same time, the involvement of the consumer in the field of AI-associated medical services is not absolutely complementary to other areas of the market, since it concerns priority values – life and health. The purpose of the work is to predict the ethical risks of deviation of the culture of consumption of AI-associated services in medicine.

Materials and methods: A secondary analysis of the 2024 and 2025 VTsIOM sociological surveys was conducted. The sample included 1,700 respondents aged 18 and over, divided into generational groups: the “digital generation” (born after 2001), “younger millennials” (born 1992–2000), older millennials (born 1982–1991), the reform generation (born 1968–1981), the generation of stagnation (born 1948–1967), and the generation of the thaw (born before 1947). Results: The largest number of positive patient expectations is associated with the hope that AI will influence the reduction of medical errors (41.2 %). In second place are expectations of a positive impact on the security of personal data in medical services (33 %). The least positive expectations are related to the possibility of AI influence on doctor-patient relationships. Only 28 % of respondents believe that the situations «in personal relationships between patients and doctors” and with «doctors’ bias towards patients of different ages» will improve. The digital generation is positive about AI’s participation in diagnosing diseases and recommending treatment (48 % feel “comfortable” and “rather comfortable”), while about half of the respondents in the older age group (46 % of the “stagnation generation”) expressed disapproval: “rather uncomfortable” and “not comfortable”).

Conclusion: It is possible to assume that a new “AI-techie” model of doctor-patient relationships will emerge in the near future, and patients of the “digital” and “millennial” generations are ready for it. The conducted analysis allows us to predict the risks of deviations in the culture of consumption of medical services associated with artificial intelligence. Given the skepticism of respondents aged 55+, we can assume the tactics of avoiding this type of medical services by patients of older age groups.

About the authors

Alena D. Donika

Volgograd State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: addonika@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3905-5538
Scopus Author ID: 57190221899

Doctor of Science (Sociology)

Russian Federation, Volgograd

Ubaidat B. Gasaynieva

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: ubayydat@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-3844-4605

postgraduate student of the Department of Philosophy

Russian Federation, Volgograd

References

  1. Leushina V.V., Karpov V.E. The ethics of artificial intelligence. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and Society. 2022;3:124–140. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30884/jfio/2022.03.07.
  2. Donika A.D. Ethics of artificial intelligence: sociological approach. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2023;16(2):26–31. (In Russ.).
  3. Constantinescu M., Voinea C., Uszkai R., Vică C. Understanding responsibility in responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context. Ethics and Information Technology. 2021;23:803–814.
  4. Hallamaa J., Kalliokoski T. How AI systems challenge the conditions of moral agency? International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Berlin, 2020:54–64.
  5. Wallach W., Vallor S. Moral machine: from value alignment to embodied virtue. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Ed. by M. Liao. New York, Oxford University Press, NYC, 2020:383–412.
  6. Nazarova Yu.V., Kashirin A.Yu. Dilemmas of the ethics of artificial intelligence. Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo. 2020;4(36):23–31. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22405/2304-4772-2020-1-4-23-31.
  7. Maltseva I.S., Gachenko R.A. Consumption of medicines by the population as an indicator of health-preserving culture in the region. Vestnik Majkopskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologiceskogo universiteta. 2024;16(1):121–131. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47370/2078-1024-2024-16-1-121-131.
  8. Khudaykulova N.A. Formation of a culture of consumption of innovative technologies in medicine. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov = Economic and humanitarian studies of regions. 2024;3:72–79. (In Russ.).
  9. Eremina M.V. Social group “65+”: the ethical dilemma of the pandemic. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2022;15(1):46–50. (In Russ.).
  10. Sedova N.N. Bioethics in an era of change: vulnerable groups. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2022;15(1):3–5. (In Russ.).
  11. Aksenova E.I., Kamynina N.N. Value-oriented healthcare: Moscow practice. Moskovskaya meditsina = Moscow Medicine. 2022;5(51):24–26. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Patients’ expectations related to AI integration in medicine. The ordinate axis shows the levels of expectations: ME – medical errors, PMRS – security of patients’ personal medical records, DPPR – difficulties in personal relationships between patients and doctors, BP – doctors’ bias towards patients of different ages. The abscissa axis shows the number of respondents in %

Download (102KB)
3. Fig. 2. Attitudes towards the integration of AI into medical practice[2]. The ordinate axis shows generational groups. The abscissa axis shows the number of respondents as a percentage of the distribution of answers to the question.

Download (147KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Donika A.D., Gasaynieva U.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).