Ethical education in the medical university: european practice


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of bioethical education in medical universities. The urgency of the topic is conditioned by the society's need to balance the benefits and risks of applying modern biological or medical technologies, which requires a broader implementation of the principles of bioethics in modern medical practice. Awareness of future medical specialists about the problems and risks in the field under consideration will reduce the possibility of abuse of these technologies. As the review of domestic and foreign literature has shown, the goals of bioethical education are characterized by a wide range, the main ones of which are contained in the domestic bioethics curricula for medical universities and contain such elements as the development of medical knowledge in an interdisciplinary context; inculcating the skills of analyzing the risk / benefit ratio, as well as critical thinking and decision making, reflexive processes; personal moral development. In European practice, various teaching methods for different target groups are used, such as lectures, seminars, narratives, role plays, presentations and analysis, writing essays, small group discussions, online discussion forums, newsletters, discussions, etc. that play an important role in achieving the above goals. At the same time, each country has its own cultural and mental values that determine its tendencies and key moments in the development of pedagogical technologies of bioethical education. The analysis of the moral games used in the bioethical education of medical specialists under the UNESCO program allowed them to give a general description, in the form of a scheme proposed in the article, containing elements such as the name of the game, its purpose, requirements for conducting, description, recommendations. The characterization of several "moral games" presented in the article demonstrates their purposeful certainty and, at the same time, the simplicity and availability of the application in pedagogical practice of teaching bioethics. This allows them to be recommended for inclusion in national practice, subject to further analysis and adaptation

About the authors

A. D Donika

Volgograd State medical University; Volgograd Medical Research Center

Email: addonika@yndex.ru
doctor of Sociology, associate professor, professor of the department of Philosophy, Bioethics and Law with a Course of Medical Sociology, Volgograd State medical University, Senior Researcher in the Department of ethical, judicial and sociological expertise in medicine, Volgograd Medical Research Center Volgograd

P. R Yagupov

Volgograd State medical University

Email: biosoc2008@yandex.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Internal Medicine of Pediatric and Dental Schools Volgograd

I. M Chekanin

Volgograd State medical University

Email: biosoc2008@yandex.ru
PhD, Associate Professor, Director of Medical College Volgograd

I. V. Shestakova

Volgograd State medical University

Email: biosoc2008@yandex.ru
senior lecturer of the department of Economics and Management Volgograd

References

  1. Доника А.Д. Проблема формирования этических регуляторов профессиональной деятельности врача // Биоэтика. - 2015. - № 1(15). - С.58-60.
  2. Доника А.Д. Современные тенденции исследований проблемы профессиогенеза на модели медицинских специальностей // Экология человека. - 2017. - № 2. - С.52-57.
  3. Калякина Н.И. Биоэтические аспекты применения медицинских инноваций // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. - 2017. - № 4-1. - С. 49 50.
  4. Олимпиева М. А. Инновационная медицина: интересы науки и общества // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. - 2017. - № 4-1. - С. 50
  5. Петров В.И., Седова Н.Н. О чем забыли сказать в новом законе // Биоэтика. - 2011. - № 2(8). - С.26-25.
  6. Чеканин И.М. Социально-психологический контент профессионального образования // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. - 2016. - № 3 (часть1). - С.105.
  7. Чередниченко Д.О. Биоэтика в контексте инновационных технологий в медицине // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. - 2017. - № 4-1. - С. 50-51
  8. Худякова Д.В. Биоэтика и современная медицинская практика: «благо» и «здоровье» // Международный журнал экспериментального образования. - 2017. - № 4-1. - С.57-58.
  9. UNESCO, 2014. Casebook on Human Dignity and Human Rights, Bioethics Core Curriculum Casebook Series, No. 1, UNESCO: Paris, 144 pp.
  10. Darryl R.J. Macer, Ph.D. Moral Games for Teaching Bioethics UNESCO Chair in Bioethics. Paris. 2014.
  11. Donika A. Sociolodical studies in medicine: Bioethical content (Russian experience). Medicine and Law. 2018. Т.37. № 2. С.315-326.
  12. Donika A.D. The study of professional deformations of doctors as deviations of their professional role // International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. Т. 8. № 2. С. 13746-13761.
  13. Chen B., Goshen E., Karmi T. Freedom of expression versus respect for the profession // UNESCO Chair in Bioethics 10th World Conference on Bioethics, Medical Ethics and Health Law, Jerusalem, Israel, January 6-8, 2015 / Program and Book of Abstracts - P.26-27.
  14. Sedova N.N. Methodology Connection Between Bioethics & Law // 23rd Annual of Worid Association for Medical Law (WAML) Congress. July 10-13, 2017 Baku, Azerbaijan // Book of Abstracts - p.99.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Donika A.D., Yagupov P.R., Chekanin I.M., Shestakova I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).