Returning to phylosophical foundation of bioethics (Review of the monograph by B.A. Navrotskiy and M. V. Reymer “Philosophical anthropology as the methodology of “culturological turn” in bioethics”)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

At the end of 2016 year the monograph “Philosophical anthropology as the methodology of “culturological turn” in bioethics” by Volgograd scientists Boris Alexandrovich Navrotskiy and Maria Vladimirovna Reymer was published [1]. The authors have collected the comprehensive material for bioethical discussions in the modern western intellectual community which is compared to the domestic bioethical tradition, though they do not apply the scale 'good-bad'. The main advantage of the book is the freedom of thought which the authors give to readers. There are not any absolute judgments and definite conclusions in the monograph. The authors are likely to suggest that the readers could reflect on the fate of modern bioethics. In fact, there were many difficulties in the development of that field of science.

About the authors

N. N Sedova

Volgograd Medical Research Center ”; Volgograd state medical university

Email: nns18@yandex.ru
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Doctor of Juridical Sciences, full Professor, head of the Department of the ethical, legal and sociological expertise, head of the Department of Philosophy, Bioethics and Law with a course of Sociology of Medicine Volgograd

References

  1. Navrotskiy B.A, Reymer M.V. Philosophical anthropology as the methodology of “culturological turn” in bioethics [Text]: monograph/ B. A. Navrotskiy, M.V.Reymer - Volgograd: Publishing house of VolsMU, 2016. - 152 с.
  2. Navrotskiy B.A. Complementarity of interpretative procedures in biology and bioethics [Text]/B. A. Navrotskiy // Challenges of information society: from bioethics to bioethics. Proceedings of VII International symposium, 22 - 23 October, 2015, Kiev. Kiev: Publishing house of NMAPO. - 2015. - P. 49.
  3. Potter V. R. Bioethics: bridge to the future [Text] /V.R. Potter. M.: Editorial URSS, 2010. - 370 p.
  4. Sedova N.N. Bioethics as applied philosophy [Text]:/N.N. Sedova//Bioethics. 2010. №1. P.7 - 10.
  5. Reymer M.V. Bioethics in the cultural paradigm of postmodernism [Text]/M.V. Reymer// Bioethics. 2014. № 1. P. 16-19.
  6. Navrotskiy B.A. Ethical patterns of “human enhancement technologies” [Text] /N.N. Sedova, B.A. Navrotskiy// Survival strategy in the context of bioethics, phylosophy and medicine. Issue
  7. Chisinau. - 2015. - P. 8 - 12.
  8. Reymer M.V. Communitarian approach as the consequence of anthropological tradition in bioethics [Text] / M.V.Reymer // Proceedings of XIV international correspondence practical
  9. conference «Scientific discussion: issues of sociology, political science, phylosophy, history» M. 2013. - P. 82-86.
  10. Natalya Nikolaevna Sedova and Maria Vladimirovna Reymer. From literary bioethics to bioethical literature // Life Science Journal 2014; 11(10s) - P. 538 - 543.
  11. Pellegrino, E. D. and. Thomasma D. The Christian Virtues in Medical Practice. - New York: Oxford University Press. - 1996.302 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Sedova N.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).