The Relationship Between Administrative and Judicial Evidence in the Case of Bringing to Administrative Responsibility for Failure to Comply with the Instructions of Control (Supervisory) Bodies

Problem statement. For a long time, in theoretical developments, scientists did not pay the necessary and due attention to the existence of an obvious connection between the extra-judicial administrative process and the judicial administrative process, directing the movement of scientific thought only to the solution of individual problematic issues. With the development of the theory of an integrative understanding of the administrative process, scientific knowledge acquired a systemic character, which made it possible to trace and substantiate the relationship between extrajudicial and judicial evidence in the category of cases under study. 
The purpose of this work is to develop theoretical provisions that serve as the basis for the implementation of evidence in court in a case on bringing to administrative responsibility for failure to comply with the order of an official of a control (supervisory) body. To achieve the stated goal, the following tasks were set: 1) to study the relationship between extra-judicial and judicial evidence in the category of cases under study; 2) to substantiate the specifics of interaction between the court and the public administration body at the stages of the judicial administrative process.
The study used the general philosophical dialectical materialistic method of cognition, general scientific methods: logical and systemic, as well as a specific scientific method – formal-legal. 
Brief Conclusion. Based on an integrative approach to understanding the administrative process, scientifically based categorization of administrative cases, theory of polymorphism of administrative torts, the points of intersection of extra-judicial and judicial evidence in the case of bringing to administrative responsibility for failure to comply with the order of an official of the control (supervisory) body are highlighted, which are at every stage of the judicial administrative process. Taking into account the complexity, ambiguity, and volume of the category of court cases under consideration, a conclusion was made about the need to grant an official the rights of a participant (party) in a court case on an administrative offense and the advisability of keeping minutes of the court hearing by the judge.