Legal and Factual Presumptions in Proceedings on Administrative Offenses in Courts of General Jurisdiction

Problem statement. In the domestic science of administrative procedure, the features of proof when considering cases of administrative offenses by judges of courts of general jurisdiction have not been sufficiently studied. Such phenomena as empirical provisions and factual presumptions require recognition and understanding, according to the fact that similar phenomena are actively studied in other procedural sciences. Judicial proof in proceedings on cases of administrative offenses is devalued to elementary law enforcement activity, while it is mainly a subtle intellectual activity based on the life and professional experience of the judge.