Email this article 
On the Dualism of Evidence-Indications in Administrative Process
- Authors: Fedorova T.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
- Issue: No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 94-101
- Section: Public law (state law) studies
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2072-909X/article/view/364492
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2025.4.94-101
- ID: 364492
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
This article presents the author’s scientific reasoning regarding the different legal nature of evidence. Previously existing approaches, as a rule, are devoted to identifying various classifications of evidence according to the philosophical theory of reflection. Meanwhile, in a specific administrative case, many pieces of evidence are of a unified (general – the author’s explanation) nature. They relate to the competence of officials, statutes of limitations, a set of procedural actions, the structure of a court decision, etc. Consequently, the adversarial nature of the principles of administrative process will either lead to legality and legal equality, or satisfy the needs of society to identify objective truth in accordance with the law. The author does not claim the unconditional nature of the presented types of evidence depending on their legal nature.
Full Text
About the authors
Tatiana V. Fedorova
Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
Author for correspondence.
Email: t-kazina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3790-9093
Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor of the Salishcheva Administrative Law and Procedure Department.
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Fedorova, T. V. The system of society’s needs for administrative proof. Grazhdanin i pravo = Citizen and Law. 2023;(7):23-32. (In Russ.)
- Shishkina, O. E. Administrative responsibility in Russia: history of origin and social basis (1835–1892). Istoricheskaya i social’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ = Historical and Social-Educational Studies. 2019;11(4):161-174. (In Russ.)
- Stakhov, A. I., Zyuzin, V. A., Landerson, N. V., et al. New approaches to the modern theory of the administrative process in Russia. Monograph. Ed. A. I. Stakhov. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2023. 448 p. (In Russ.)
- Koval, V. P. Theory of cognition and reflection as a methodological basis for the theory of evidence. In: E. L. Leshchina, E. M. Ofman, eds. Law and court in the modern world. Collection of articles based on the materials of the XIII annual International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students and Young Scientists (Chelyabinsk, 10–11 December 2015). Pt. 4. Moscow: Yustitsiya; 2016. Рp. 92–95. (In Russ.)
- Shishkina, O. E. The reasons for the institutionalization of administrative responsibility in post-revolutionary Russia (1917–1924). Istoricheskaya i social’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ = Historical and Social-Educational Studies. 2021;13(2):161-174. (In Russ.)
- Fedorova, T. V. Administrative “prufilogy” as an integral part of the unified doctrine of evidence. In: S. V. Shefel, S. V. Zemlyachev, comp. Economics, management, law and society. Proceedings of the VII Interregional Scientific and Practical online Internet Conference (Simferopol, 20 October 2022). Simferopol: Arial; 2023. Рp. 177–179. (In Russ.)
- Salishcheva, N. G. Administrative responsibility: issues of theory and practice. Ed. N. Yu. Khamaneva. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2004. 136 p. (In Russ.)
- Salishcheva, N. G. Problems of the legal regulation of the institute of administrative responsibility in the Russian Federation. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2014;(9):9-22. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
