On the Procedural Status of the Procurator in Non-Judicial Administrative Procedure
- Authors: Podeiko V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 102-112
- Section: Public law (state law) studies
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2072-909X/article/view/364493
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2025.4.102-112
- ID: 364493
Cite item
Abstract
For the last three centuries of the Russian state’s history the procuratorate, or procuracy, has played a special role in the state apparatus. This was contemplated recently, in particular, in Art. 129 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as amended in 2020. Such a role, in turn, is a prerequisite of the special status of the procurator not only in criminal and civil procedure, but also – and even especially – in administrative procedure, which was emphasized not only by Russian, but also by foreign authors. However, the issue of the procurator’s status in administrative procedure has not yet been studied enough, and existing studies consider only the judicial administrative procedure (administrative court procedure). At the same time the status of the procurator in non-judicial administrative procedure poses an interest not just from a scholarly, but also from a purely practical point of view. Studying the procuratorial supervision from an administrative procedural point of view using a modern integrative approach to administrative procedure is hence apparent. Although there is no general administrative procedure act in Russia and the regulations on administrative procedure are largely somewhat of a patchwork, the analysis of the procurator’s procedural status in the legislation on control and supervisory activities, as well as administrative penal, tax and some other laws allows to put together a classification of the procurator’s administrative procedural functions and to propose guidelines for the further development of the legislation with regard to them.
The purpose of the work is a comprehensive study of the administrative procedural status of the procurator in Russian non-judicial administrative procedure. The objectives of the study are: 1) defining the procedural status of the procurator as that of a representative of the general state public interest in non-judicial administrative procedure; 2) formulating the problem of patchwork, or fragmentary, regulation of non-judicial administrative procedure and, therefore, of the procurator’s status in various administrative proceedings.
The study used systematic, logical, formal and legal, as well as comparative methods.
Brief Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the norms of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation in the article: 1) the procedural status of the procurator as that of a representative of the general state public interest in non-judicial administrative procedure is defined; 2) a classification of the procurator’s administrative procedural functions in non-judicial administrative procedure (these include: initiating of a proceeding; intervening into an already initiated procedure; sanctioning; and resolving a dispute on jurisdiction) is proposed; 3) the problems of the legal regulation of administrative proceedings and the necessity of providing for a unified procedural status of the procurator in administrative proceedings is emphasized.
Full Text
About the authors
Vadim A. Podeiko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: v.podeiko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-1995-0065
Candidate of Science (Law), Deputy Head of the Legal Department.
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Kischel, U. Rechtsvergleichung. München: C. H. Beck; 2015. 1010 S.
- Mayer, O. Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht. 3. Aufl. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; 1924. 382 р.
- Muravyov, N. V. Prosecutor’s supervision in its structure and activities. Vol. 1. Prosecutor’s office in the West and in Russia. Moscow: University Printing House; 1889. 552 p. (In Russ.)
- Korf, S. A. Administrative justice in Russia. In 2 vols, in 3 bs. Vol. 1. B. 1: An essay on the historical development of the power of supervision and administrative justice in Russia. St. Petersburg: Trenke and Fusno Printing House; 1910. VIII, 528 p. (In Russ.)
- Berezovskaya, S. G., Vasiliev, R. F., Eropkin, M. I., et al. Soviet administrative law. Methods and forms of public administration. Monograph. Eds. Yu. M. Kozlov, B. M. Lazarev, A. E. Luneva, et al. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1977. 336 p. (In Russ.)
- Afanasyeva, T. I. On some problems of the legal support of the prosecutor’s involvement in administrative proceedings. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge. 2021;(8):43-48. (In Russ.)
- Grechkina, O. V. Powers of the prosecutor in administrative proceedings. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2018;(11):73-75. (In Russ.)
- Sarpekov, R. K., Sherstoboev, O. N., Nurgazinov, B. K. Prosecutor’s involvement in an administrative judicial procedure: a comparative law research. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2020;(3):41-46. (In Russ.)
- Koshelev, D. A. On challenging aspects of exercising the prosecutor’s powers in administrative offense proceedings. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;(1):73-76. (In Russ.)
- Shonin, I. G. Separate issues of prosecutorial supervision in the sphere of proceedings in cases of administrative offences. Zakonnost’ = Legality. 2022;(7):23-26. (In Russ.)
- But, N. V., Egupov, D. A. Prosecutor’s protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in the field of administrative jurisdiction. Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossijskoj Federatsii = Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2023;(6):36-45. (In Russ.)
- Polyakova, N. A. Issues of exercising prosecutors’ powers associated with assurance of legality in organization of audits in the housing sphere by control authorities. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;(9):66-69. (In Russ.)
- Maier, C. Der Weg zu einer eigenständigen Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Russischen Föderation. Probleme des Verwaltungsrechtsschutzes im modernen Russland. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; 2015. 320 S.
- Müller, A. Das Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit im Vergleich. Vergleichendes Verwaltungsrecht in Ostmitteleuropa. Grundriss des Verwaltungsordnungen Polens, Tschechiens, der Slowakei und Ungarns. Hrsg. B. Wieser, A. Stolz. Wien: Verlag Österreich; 2004. Ss. 549–586.
- Wieser, B. Das Verwaltungsverfahren im Vergleich. Vergleichendes Verwaltungsrecht in Südosteuropa. Grundriss des Verwaltungsordnungen Sloweniens, Kroatiens, Serbiens und Mazedoniens. Hrsg. B. Wieser, A. Stolz. Wien: Verlag Österreich; 2016. Ss. 373–403.
- Kononov, P. I., Stakhov, A. I. About the draft Federal law “On administrative proceedings in the Russian Federation”. Zhurnal administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva = Journal of the Administrative Proceedings. 2017;(3):40-68. (In Russ.)
- Stakhov, A. I. The integrative theory of the administrative process is the only true basis for building a model of the administrative process. Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie = Siberian Law Review. 2021;(3):313-327. (In Russ.)
- Stakhov, A. I. Administrative proceedings in the Russian Federation: the concept, structure, types, procedure. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;(1):3-11. (In Russ.)
- Hengstschläger, J., Leeb, D. Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht: Verfahren vor den Verwaltungsbehörden und Verwaltungsgerichten. 5. Aufl. Wien: Facultas.wuv; 2014. 658 S.
- Vasilyeva, A. F. Codification of general principles of administrative law. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburg-skogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2024;15(3):617-635. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files

