Consideration of Petitions for Permission to Cancel a Decision to Terminate a Criminal Case or Criminal Prosecution
- 作者: Tumasyan A.S.1
-
隶属关系:
- Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
- 期: 编号 6 (2024)
- 页面: 91-99
- 栏目: Criminal law studies
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 26.01.2026
- ##submission.datePublished##: 20.06.2024
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2072-909X/article/view/376321
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.6.91-99
- ID: 376321
如何引用文章
详细
The article presents the results of an analysis of court decisions related to the application of the rules governing the judicial procedure for obtaining permission to cancel decisions to terminate a criminal case and criminal prosecution after one year from the date of their issuance (Part 1.1 of Article 214 and Article 214.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). Particular attention is paid to the courts’ interpretation of the grounds for granting a petition for permission to cancel decisions to terminate criminal prosecution, and their understanding of “new information that is subject to additional investigation”.
Specific examples from judicial practice show the motives for judges making relevant decisions. The issue of the admissibility of the results of operational-search activities as “new information” indicating the need to resume the criminal prosecution of a suspect or accused is specifically highlighted and considered.
全文:
作者简介
Alexandra Tumasyan
Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: erikevamoi@mail.ru
Lecturer of the Department
俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar参考
- Desyatov, M. S. Law enforcement in operational investigative activities: questions of theory. Monograph. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022. 256 p. (In Russ.)
- Polyakov, M. P. The results of operational investigative activities as an alternative to criminal procedural evidence. Ugolovnyj protsess = Criminal Process. 2005;(8):39-41. (In Russ.)
补充文件

