Social protection of workers on digital labor platforms: Approaches to addressing the issue
- Authors: Kolotova N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 29, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 930-946
- Section: LAW AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2313-2337/article/view/363994
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-930-946
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LLUELN
- ID: 363994
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The problem of social protection for employees of digital labor platforms is actively discussed worldwide, yet balanced solutions that harmoniously reconcile the interests of the state, business entities, consumers, and platform workers have not been found. The effectiveness of these efforts largely depends on accurately classifying persons performing platform work as either employees or independent contractors (self-employed, implementing partners), since their status determines the scope of their social protection. Individuals under employment contracts typically receive more extensive and stable social guarantees than those engaged through civil law contracts. However, platform employment is diverse, and digital labor platforms that act as active intermediaries in local labor markets (for example, taxi services, delivery services, home and home services) blur the boundaries between labor and civil law relations by transforming the status of workers. Legally independent contractors may, in practice, be subject to direct control by the platform through algorithmic management. This blurring makes distinguishing self-employment from disguised employment a pressing scientific and practical challenge, and a prerequisite for developing appropriate social protections regardless of employment form. This article explores possible approaches to solving this problem: judicial reclassification of employment status, establishing presumption of employment relationships, and introducing hybrid employment models into legislation. Examples from various jurisdictions regulating platform work (USA, European Union, Ireland, Spain) illustrate these methods. The study’s relevance is understood by recent Russian federal legislation adopting a civil law model for organizing work on digital platforms. International experience broadens the perspective, highlights advantages and challenges of differing approaches, and guides future efforts to find balanced regulation of platform employment.
About the authors
Natalia V. Kolotova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: kolotova.n@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6184-3763
SPIN-code: 5472-6255
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Acting Head of the Human Rights Department
10 Znamenka St., Moscow, 119019, Russian FederationReferences
- Behrendt, Ch., Nguyen, Q.A. & Rani U. (2019) Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review. Special Issue: Social security and the digital economy. 72 (3), 17-41.
- Burdic, B. (2019) Dynamex Operation West Inc. v. Superior Court. Berkely Journal of Employment and Labor Law. 40 (1), 167-180. https://www.doi.org/10.15779/Z38RVOD141
- Chikanova, L.A. & Seregina, L.V. (2018) Legal Protection of Citizens against Unemployment in Context of Information Technology Innovations in the Field of Labor and Employment. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. (3), 149-171. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2018.3.149.171
- Chucha, S.Y. (2024) Ensuring and Protecting Social and Labor Rights in the Context of the Transformation of the Sphere of Labor and Employment. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (in Russian).
- Girich, M.G., Ivanovicheva, K.V. & Levashenko, A.D. (2022) Taxation and Social Insurance for Employees of Online Platforms: Comparison of Russian and International Experience. Financial Journal. 14 (3), 44-60. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-3-44-60
- Hießl, Ch. (2024) Case Law on the Classification of Platform Workers: Cross-European Comparative Analysis and Tentative Conclusions. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal. https://www.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3839603
- Nioradze, G.B. (2022) Older Workers’ Labor and the Gig-Economy: Precarization or New Opportunities? Sociological Journal. 28 (4), 102-117. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/ socjour.2022.28.4.9317
- Kuzminov, Ya.I., Koshel, A.S. & Kruchinskaia, E.V. (2025) Platform regulation as bona fides: From economic efficiency to rule. Public Administration Issues. (1), 7-37. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-1-7-37
- Lyutov, N.L. & Chernykh, N.V. (2023) Labor law in conditions of great challenges. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (in Russian).
- Motina, E.V., Tomashevsky, K.L. & Chichina, E.V. (2024) Legal regulation of atypical forms of employment in the context of digitalization and regional integration. Minsk, Amalfeya Publ. (in Russian).
- Ponomareva, K.A. (2025) The legal status of digital platforms and their employees: Transformation at the intersection of tax and labor law. Pravovedenie. 69 (1), 102-124. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10 21638/spbu25 2025 106
- Potemkina, O.Yu. (2024) Employed or Self- Employed: the Problem of Regulating Platform Work in the EU. Sovremennaia Evropa. (4), 126-139. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.31857/S0201708324040107
- Weber, T., Eiffe, F.F. & Adăscăliței, D. (2024) Self-employment in the EU: Job quality and developments in social protection. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
- Shevchuk, A.V. (2010) Boundaries of autonomy: the phenomenon of “dependent self-employment”. Sociological Journal. 2010. (3), 35-51.
- Шевчук А.В. Границы автономии: феномен «зависимой самозанятости» // Социологический журнал. 2010. № 3. С. 35-51.
- Sinyavskaya, O.V. et al. (2024) Platform employment in Russia: the dynamics of prevalence and key characteristics of the employed. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (in Russian).
- Standing, G. (2014) The Precariat: a new dangerous class. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ. (in Russian).
- Стэндинг Г. Прекариат: новый опасный класс. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2014. 328 с.
- Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2019) The Precariat Phenomenon: Theoretical and Methodological Premises of its Study. Sociological research. (9), 51-63. (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.31857/S013216250006669-8
Supplementary files

