Efficiency of prognostic scales in assessing patients' condition in severe acute pancreatitis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Objectives – to compare the predictive efficiency of modern scales used in prognosis of disease severity (APACHE II, SAPS, SOFA, MODS) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Material and methods. 17 patients formed two study groups: Group 1 consisted of 10 survived patients, Group 2 included 7 patients with a fatal outcome. The mortality ratio and the severity of the condition were calculated for all 17 patients, using the scales presented above, at the admission to the ICU and at the moment of transfer to a surgical department. The intensive care procedure and surgical interventions were in line with the clinical recommendations for surgical treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

Results. The day of ICU admission, Group 1, the average mortality rate on the SAPS scale was 11±0.08%; on the SOFA scale – 27±0.08%; on the MODS scale – 1–2%; on the APACHE II scale – 8.45±0.09%. The day of ICU admission, Group 2, the average mortality rate on the SAPS scale was 5.7±7.11%; on the SOFA scale – 25.14±6.09%; on the MODS scale – 2.4±1.05%; on the APACHE II scale – 12.1±8.49%. The day of patients' transfer from the ICU to the surgical department, Group1, the average mortality rate on the SAPS scale was 8.99±0.10%; on the SOFA scale – 30±0.15%; on the MODS scale – 1–2%; on the APACHE II scale – 14.29±0.08%. The day of patients' transfer from the ICU to the surgical department, Group 2, the average mortality rate on the SAPS scale was 7.7±8.69%; on the SOFA scale – 22±0%; on the MODS scale – 1–2%, on the APACHE II scale – 12.37±9.89%.

According to our data, none of the used prognostic scales could present the real condition of a patient or the mortality prognosis for patients in both groups. By comparison of the average mortality rate calculated for patients of Group 1 and Group 2, we revealed the more unfavorable prognosis for the survived patients than for the patients with lethal outcome.

Conclusion. The objective evaluation of the severity of patient's condition and the prognosis for treatment is not possible with the scales used in the study. Among them, the SAPS and APACHE II scales provided the most precise prognoses for patients' condition.

About the authors

I. V. Makarov

Samara State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: makarov-samgmu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1068-3330

PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of surgical
diseases No.1

Russian Federation, Samara

I. A. Mustafaev

Clinical hospital RZD Medicine

Email: makarov-samgmu@yandex.ru

Head of the Department of Resuscitation and intensive therapy, anesthesiologist-reanimatologist

Russian Federation, Samara

A. V. Kurashev

Clinical hospital RZD Medicine

Email: makarov-samgmu@yandex.ru

anesthesiologist-reanimatologist

Russian Federation, Samara

L. A. Budorina

Samara State Medical University

Email: makarov-samgmu@yandex.ru

general practitioner, resident doctor of the Department of surgical diseases No.1

Russian Federation, Samara

L. V. Gerasimov

Samara State Medical University

Email: makarov-samgmu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3869-6931

the 6th year medical student

Russian Federation, Samara

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Survival analysis by the Kaplan – Meier estimator.

Download (19KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Makarov I.V., Mustafaev I.A., Kurashev A.V., Budorina L.A., Gerasimov L.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).