Conceptual aspects of the formation and development of a multisubject model of pedagogical education in Russia
- Authors: Fominykh S.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yakovlev CHSPU
- Issue: Vol 16, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 169-189
- Section: Educational and Pedagogical Studies
- Published: 31.10.2025
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2658-4034/article/view/363413
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-5-841
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LPCZJU
- ID: 363413
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The purpose of the article is to conceptually substantiate the formation and development of the polysubject model of pedagogical education in Russia, clarify the conceptual apparatus and propose a framework for analyzing its institutional and methodological foundations. The work specifies that a polysubject in education is a special type of community that arises from the integration of many equal participants and has the qualities of collective subjectivity; the provisions on polysubject interaction (I. V. Vachkov) are used as a theoretical support. Methodologically, the model unfolds in the logic of the synergetic approach: contradictions, crises and external challenges are considered as triggers for self-organization and maturation of polysubjectivity (the effect of "growth points" of complex systems). The network form of implementation of educational programs, enshrined in Federal Law No. 273-FZ, as well as initiatives of the period of the national project "Education" (2019-2024) and the creation of centers for continuous professional development of teachers as an infrastructure of horizontal interaction and distributed participation are analyzed as a normative and program framework.
Materials and methods. Within the framework of this methodological framework, working definitions are formulated and clarified, and a coherent research design is proposed: the stage-by-stage formation of a polysubject (initiation – development of interaction – stability – adaptability – self-development) and signs of maturity (collective identity "we", the ability to self-regulate and distribute roles, horizontal cooperation, joint meaning-making and initiation of innovations).
These elements are derived from domestic sources, primarily from the works of I. V. Vachkov and synergetic literature, and are correlated with the legal and organizational framework of modern teacher training.
The study uses a set of methods: systemic structural and synergetic analysis of domestic and foreign pedagogical concepts, strategic documents and regulatory legal acts on network forms of training; modeling, interpretation.
Results. A research design of the stages of development of a polysubject model has been formulated: from initiation (awareness of the need to combine efforts and primary coordination of goals) through the development of interaction (the emergence of stable channels of communication and cooperation), sustainability (the formation of a common structure of roles, procedures and meanings), adaptability (the ability of a community to restructure the distribution of functions and generate new forms of joint activity in response to changes in the environment) – to self-development (a combination of internal motivation of participants, self-regulation and initiative, when the community becomes a source of innovation).
Conclusion. Qualitative growth in teacher training is achieved where the plurality of participants in education turns into collective subjectivity with its properties – a common semantic space, self-regulation, cooperation and the ability to innovate.
About the authors
Svetlana O. Fominykh
Yakovlev CHSPU
Author for correspondence.
Email: ermakovaso@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8679-8687
Candidate of Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics and Physics
Russian Federation, 38, K. Marks Str., Cheboksary, 428000, Russian Federation
References
- Abulkhanova, K. A. (1991). Life strategy (299 pp.). Moscow: Mysl’.
- Afanasyeva, O. Yu., Bystray, E. B., Skorobrenko, I. A., & Znikina, L. S. (2023). Polysubject nature of the educational process in higher education as a factor in the professional development of future teachers. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2(50), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.54509/22203036_2023_2_5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BEHVGM
- Bondarevskaya, E. V., & Kulnevich, S. V. (1999). Pedagogy: Personality in humanistic theories and systems of education (560 pp.). RostovonDon: Uchitel’. Retrieved from: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_004660517/ (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Vachkov, I. V. (2014). Polysubjective interaction in the educational environment. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 36–50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TWHXMB
- Ivanova, S. P. (2013). Polysubjective interaction in the sociopedagogical environment as a factor in developing professional and personal competence of teachers. Bulletin of Pskov State University. Series: Social, Humanitarian and Psychological Sciences, 3, 161–170. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RDKOEL
- Knyazeva, E. N., & Kurdyumov, S. P. (2005). Foundations of synergetics: Human, constructivity, selforganization (272 pp.). Moscow: KomKniga. Retrieved from: https://urss.ru/cgi-bin/db.pl?lang=Ru&blang=ru&page=Book&id=42732 (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Kovalenko, V. I. (2004). Polysubjective management of educational system development (on the material of universities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia) (300 pp.). Belgorod: BelSU Publishing House. ISBN: 5957101214. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QUZEJZ
- Krolevetskaya, E. N. (2022). Polysubjective interaction as the basis for professional training of future teachers in higher education. Modern HighTech Technologies, 122, 347–352. https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.39483. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SKZPEI
- Krolevetskaya, E. N. (2022). Polysubjectivity of a future teacher’s personality as a psychological and pedagogical phenomenon. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 743, 162–165. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IAMJTO
- Podshivalkina, V. I., & Biryukova, M. V. (2014). Polysubjectivity as a social phenomenon. Praxiological discourse. Sociological Research, 4, 13–19. Retrieved from: https://www.socis.isras.ru/index.php?page_id=453&id=5888&jid=&jj= (accessed: 31.07.2025). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SEIJKP
- Rubinstein, S. L. (1959). Principles and ways of psychological development (354 pp.). Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Retrieved from: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000200_000018_rc_4979797/ (accessed: 31.07.2025). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VXCCQA
- Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., & Shiyanov, E. N. (2013). Pedagogy: Textbook for students of secondary vocational education institutions (5th ed., stereotyped) (496 pp.). Moscow: Publishing Center “Academia”. Retrieved from: https://academia-moscow.ru/ftp_share/_books/fragments/fragment_20735.pdf (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Slastenin, V. A., & Asadullin, R. M. (2005). Formation of the teacher’s personality as a subject of pedagogical activity. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 5, 3–19. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PJIZQL
- Falunina, E. V. (2019). Psychology of polysubjective personality and polysubjective approach in education. Eurasian Union of Scientists, 2(59), 15–16. Retrieved from: https://euroasia-science.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Euroasia_journal_8_part.pdf (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Sharshov, I. A. (2013). Biobibliographical note with a list of scientific works, including the monograph “Models of interaction between subjects of the educational process in higher education”. Retrieved from: https://www.tsutmb.ru/files/biblio/1/%D0%A8%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D0%BE%D0%B2%20%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%20%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%8701.pdf (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Sharshov, I. A. (2013). Leading trends and principles of interaction between subjects of the educational process in higher education under modernization and increased competitiveness of Russian higher education. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanitarian Sciences, 11(127), 74–84. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RSFVFD
- Sharshov, I. A., Makarova, L. N., & Startsev, M. V. (2013). Models of interaction between subjects of the educational process in higher education: Monograph (360 pp.). Tambov: Publishing House of TSU named after G. R. Derzhavin. Retrieved from: https://www.tsutmb.ru/nayk/nauchnyie_shkolyi_i_napravleniya/pedagogicheskie_nauki/problemyi_razvitiya_professionalizma_subektov_obrazovatelnogo_procze/osnovnyie_publikaczii_chlenov_nauchnogo_napravleniya/ (accessed: 31.07.2025)
- Bamrungsin, P., & Khampirat, B. (2022). Improving professional skills of preservice teachers using online training: Applying work integrated learning approaches through a quasi experimental study. Sustainability, 14, 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074362. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GAELLV
- Batagan, L., & Boja, C. (2012). Smart solutions for educational systems — Case study. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4834–4838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.344
- Hollins, E., PozúFranco, J., & MuñozGuevara, L. (2021). Teacher training for the transformation of schools and communities. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 2 December 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.775
- Mohamadi, Z., & Malekshahi, N. (2018). Designing and validating a potential formative evaluation inventory for teacher competences. Language Testing in Asia, 8, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OMMKMG
- Odalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G., Schaffer, J., & Fogelgren, M. (2019). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512955
Supplementary files


