Perceptions of Generation Z students on error correction and feedback in foreign language speaking instruction at non‑linguistic universities
- Authors: Semyonkina I.A.1,2, Pavlova T.A.3
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Sevastopol State University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 212-237
- Section: Educational and Pedagogical Studies
- Published: 31.10.2025
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2658-4034/article/view/363457
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-5-924
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KJIAVG
- ID: 363457
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Oral correction of speech errors is a significant element of the foreign language education system, fulfilling functions such as stimulating linguistic thinking, developing real-life interaction skills, and creating a supportive learning environment. When organically integrated into communicative activities, it serves as a catalyst for the development of foreign language competence, necessitating its methodologically sound design with consideration for cognitive and affective aspects of language acquisition. Despite extensive research on correction techniques in language pedagogy, learners' perceptions of teacher feedback remain an understudied area, particularly in the context of generational specifics. This study focuses on analyzing the preferences of non-linguistic university students representing Generation Z regarding oral correction in foreign language speaking instruction.
Purpose to examine and analyze the perceptions of Generation Z students regarding oral error correction and feedback in university foreign language classes, as well as to identify their preferences and effective strategies for correcting speech errors.
Materials and methods. The authors analyzed practical and theoretical scientific-methodological research on approaches to providing correction in foreign language speaking instruction, as well as a study of non-linguistic university students' perceptions of these approaches.
Results showed that Generation Z students prefer immediate yet tactful error correction and value personalized feedback incorporating elements of digital technology. The most effective forms of addressing speech inaccuracies were identified, contributing to motivation and reducing the language barrier. The findings can be used to optimize foreign language teaching methodologies in universities, taking into account the characteristics of today's learners.
About the authors
Irina A. Semyonkina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Russian State University for the Humanities
Author for correspondence.
Email: isemyonkina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7181-5923
SPIN-code: 3644-9283
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, 49, Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation; 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Pavlova
Sevastopol State University
Email: tatyana_bokhan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8033-3272
SPIN-code: 7527-6320
Senior Lecturer
Russian Federation, 33, Universitetskaya Str., Sevastopol, 299053, Russian Federation
References
- Gal’skova, N. D., & Gez, N. I. (2019). Theory of foreign language teaching: Linguodidactics and methodology. Moscow: Akademiya.
- Passov, E. I. (2021). Foundations of communicative methodology in foreign language teaching. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk.
- RANEPA. (2024). Generation Z in Russia: Values, educational strategies, digital socialization. Moscow: RANEPA Publishing House.
- Semenkina, I. A. (2025). An effective foreign language teacher in higher education: Analysis of students’ opinions. Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, 15(S1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-c-115-123. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HIHEIG
- Shchukin, A. N. (2020). Methods of teaching foreign languages. Moscow: Filomatis.
- Alkhammash, R., & Gulnaz, F. (2019). Perceptions of EFL learners about oral corrective feedback in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 45–58.
- Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.
- Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
- Ha, X. V., Murray, J. C., & Riazi, A. M. (2021). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KKTPBZ
- Kartchava, E. (2020). Oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Teaching and Learning, Berlin.
- Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86–109.
- Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
- Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FOSJSF
- McKinsey & Company. (2022). Gen Z and education: The future of learning. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com
- Nassaji, H. (2016). Immediate and delayed corrective feedback, oral accuracy, and fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 459–488.
- Nisa, S. H. (2018). Students’ preferences toward oral corrective feedback in speaking class. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 78–92.
- Nurjanah, L., Rahmaningtyas, H., & Yaniafari, R. P. (2024). Exploring Generation Z’s preferences for oral corrective feedback in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 112–125.
- Pew Research Center. (2023). How Generation Z is reshaping education and work. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org
- Septianisa, R. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ perceptions of oral corrective feedback: A case study in Indonesian context. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14333a. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KJUGWS
- Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 593–610). Routledge.
Supplementary files


