Improving self‑organisation of learning a foreign language in students with different types of subject regulation
- Authors: Fadeyeva T.Y.1, Kosareva S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 560-584
- Section: Psychological Studies
- Published: 31.10.2025
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2658-4034/article/view/363629
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-5-939
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PWREEU
- ID: 363629
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Students need self-organisation skills to succeed in their learning activity in general and in learning a foreign language in particular as mastering higher levels of a language requires performing a series of specific actions regularly. Choice of actions as well as their quality depends on student’s level of subject regulation.
Purpose. The purpose of the research is to determine the interconnection of self-organisation components indicators and the indicators of self-assessment of specific actions in learning a foreign language produced by students with different levels of autonomy. This will form the basis for developing recommendations for teachers on activation of students’ cognitive activity and self-organisation.
Materials and methods. “Questionnaire of Self-Organization of Activity” by E. Yu. Mandrikova was used to study self-organisation, questionnaire “Autonomy – Dependence” by G. S. Prygin was used to analyse students’ subject regulation and the authors’ questionnaire was applied to assess students’ self-organisation efficiency in learning a foreign language. The participants were 2nd - 4th year students (N=60) in SSU.
Results. The comparative analysis (Kruskal – Wallis test) enabled the authors to determine specific features of students’ self-organisation in each of the groups singled out according to the type of subject regulation. The correlation analysis showed that in the group of “autonomous” students there are more correlations between self-organisation components and the actions focused on achieving goals in learning a foreign language. In the group of “dependent” students self-organisation components mainly correlate with the actions on checking and structuring their language learning activity. In the group of “mixed” students there are more correlations between self-organisation indicators and the actions connected with cognitive activity which ensures students’ adaptation to performing activity including learning a language. Practical value of the research is that its results can be useful for teachers in teaching a foreign language and in providing students with psychological and pedagogical support.
About the authors
Tatiana Yu. Fadeyeva
Saratov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Fadej_TU@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3499-8812
SPIN-code: 7504-5190
ResearcherId: Е-1301-2013
PhD in Pedagogics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of Social Psychology of Education and Development
Russian Federation, 83 Astrakhanskaya Str., Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Kosareva
Saratov State University
Email: MSvetlana-08@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1667-5753
SPIN-code: 7336-5687
PhD in Pedagogics, Associate Professor of Department of the English Language and Intercultural Communication
Russian Federation, 83 Astrakhanskaya Str., Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation
References
- Andreev, V. I. (1992). Selfdevelopment of a creative, competitive manager’s personality. Kazan: Firm “SKAM”, 207 p.
- Arkhangelsky, G. A., Bekhterev, S. V., Lukashenko, M. A., & Telegina, T. V. (2017). Time management. Complete course. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 311 p.
- Afanasyeva, N. A. (2008). Selforganization as a factor of academic success. Fundamental Research, 2, 60–61. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IJMDGB
- Bobkova, O. V., Gamayunova, A. N., & Vasaygina, N. N. (2024). Selforganization of personality as a condition for firstyear students’ adaptation in the university educational environment. Educational Experiment in Education, 3(111), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.51609/2079-875Х_2024_3_29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HNOQKD
- Vorobyova, M. A. (2012). The relationship between learning motivation and selforganization of activity among students. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 6, 184–188. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PULWZL
- Komova, O. V. (2015). Problems of selforganization formation. Scientific Search, 2, 11–17. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UBSJSD
- Kosareva, S. A. (2022). Pedagogical support for increasing students’ selforganization level [PhD thesis in Pedagogical Sciences]. Saratov, 185 p.
- Kosenok, Yu. N. (2024). Selforganization and selfeducation as a guarantee of successful independent work of students. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 12(6). Retrieved from https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/08PDMN624.pdf. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LNUERI
- Kotova, S. S. (2012). Selforganization of academic and professional activity of students. Yekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University Publishing House, 208 p.
- Mandrikova, E. Yu. (2010). Development of the SelfOrganization of Activity Questionnaire (SOA). Psychological Diagnostics, 2, 87–111.
- Prygin, G. S. (2009). Psychology of independence. Izhevsk, Naberezhnye Chelny: Institute of Management Publishing House, 565 p.
- Prygin, G. S. (2023). The subject and his reality. Kazan: Otechestvo, 213 p.
- Romanova, L. M. (2017). Designing a program for developing selforganization competencies among university students. Bulletin of Kazan State Power Engineering University, 1(33), 105–114. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZAOUVT
- Smolovik, G. N. (2020). Personal management. Novosibirsk: Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, 137 p.
- Stogniyeva, O. N. (2024). Using peer assessment practices in the “Academic Writing” course in English. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2, 48–68. https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-297X-2024-2-48-68. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QUVETN
- Yudin, S. A., & Akimenko, G. V. (2022). Personal temporal characteristics of students as a factor of selforganization in academic activity. Diary of Science, 11(71). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UDSHRV
- Botero, G. G., Questier, F., & Zhu, Ch. (2018). Selfdirected language learning in a mobileassisted, outofclass context: Do students walk the talk? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1485707
- Dignath, Ch., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of selfregulated learning — evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
- Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Den Broek, P., & Van Driel, J. (2022). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A metaanalysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing selffulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), SelfRegulated Learning: From Teaching to SelfReflective Practice (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- The Cambridge Life Competencies Framework. Learning to Learn. Retrieved from https://languageresearch.cambridge.org/images/Language_Research/CamFLiC/CLCF_Learning_to_Learn.pdf (accessed: 05.04.2023)
- Skyeng. Retrieved from https://skyteach.ru/uprazhneniya/5-activities-for-teaching-synonyms-and-antonyms/ (accessed: 30.07.2025)
- Skyeng. Retrieved from https://skyteach.ru/methods/yazykovaya-dogadka-i-sposoby-ee-razvitiya/ (accessed: 30.07.2025)
Supplementary files


