THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE NEUROLOGICAL CRITERION IN CONTEMPORARY CHRISTIAN BIOETHICS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The rapid development of medical technologies are foregrounded reflection on fundamental philosophical themes, and especially the theme of death. The relationship between Christian philosophy and the so - called «brain death» or neurological criteria is under investigation. The author focuses on the specifics of certitude that underlies the Christian interpretation of neurological criteria. It deals with the connections of neurological criterion to one of the main notion of the Christian philosophy of the rational soul as the form of the body. Having considered the different points of view, the position of proponents of neurological criteria is found to provide good philosophical and ethical grounds.

About the authors

A. V Volkov

Petrozavodsk State University

Email: alexvolkoff@bk.ru
Ph. D. in Philosophy, Chairman of Philosophy and Culture studies department Petrozavodsk

References

  1. Зильбер А.П. Медицина критических состояний: общие проблемы. Петрозаводск: Издательство ПГУ, 1995. - 360 с.
  2. Основы социальной концепции Русской Православной Церкви // Юбилейный Архиерейский собор Русской Православной Церкви. Москва 13 - 16 августа. СПб., 2000. - С. 150 - 211.
  3. Цепелева Н.В. Христианская антропологическая парадигма здоровья и болезни // Биоэтика. - 2013. - № 1 (11). - С. 5 - 8.
  4. Шевченко А.А. Биоэтика как раздел сотериологии // Биоэтика. - 2011. - № 1 (7). - С. 10 - 15.
  5. Austriaco N. In Defense of Bodily Integrity as a Criterion for Death: A Response to the Radical Capacity Argument // The Thomist. - 2009. - Vol. 73. - P. 647 - 659.
  6. Bernat J. Defense of the Whole - Brain Concept of Death // Hastings Center Report. - 1998. - Vol. 28 (2). - P. 14 - 23.
  7. Delmonico F. The Concept of Death and Deceased Organ Donation // International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine. - 2010. - Vol. 1 (1). - P. 15 - 20.
  8. Haas John M. Catholic Teaching regarding the Legitimacy of Neurological Criteria for the Determination of Death // The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly. - 2011. - Vol. 11 (2). - P. 279 - 299.
  9. John Paul II Address to the Eighteenth International Congress of the Transplantation Society // National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly. 2001. Vol. 1 (1). P. 89 - 92.
  10. Lizza J. Potentiality, irreversibility, and death // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. - 2005. - Vol. 30 (1). - P. 45 - 64.
  11. Machado C. Brain Death: A Reappraisal. New York: Springer, 2007. - 223 p.
  12. Shewmon A. The Brain and Somatic Integration: Insights Into the Standard Biological Rationale for Equating «Brain Death» with Death // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. - 2001. - Vol. 26. - P. 457 - 478.
  13. Tonti-Filippini N. You Only Die Twice: Augustine, Aquinas, the Council of Vienne, and Death by the Brain Criterion // Communio. - 2011. - Vol. 38. - P. 308 - 325.
  14. Veatch R. The death of whole - brain death: the plague of the Disaggregators, Somaticists, and Mentalists // Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. - 2005. - Vol. 30. - P. 353 - 378.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Volkov A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).