Reflections on Some Imperfections of the 2020 Constitutional Innovations in the Justice System
- 作者: Kleandrov M.I.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 编号 9 (2025)
- 页面: 5-9
- 栏目: Invitation to the discussion
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2072-909X/article/view/364096
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2025.9.5-9
- ID: 364096
如何引用文章
详细
Part 3 of Art. 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (as amended in 2020), which establishes the structure of the judicial system of the Russian Federation, does not include military courts. Federal constitutional legislation classifies them as courts of general jurisdiction. The paper proves that this is not the case; military courts, like arbitration courts, are courts of special jurisdiction, and courts of general jurisdiction do not consider cases assigned by law to the jurisdiction of military courts. The system of military courts itself is almost identical to the system of arbitration courts, which is also specialized. Another imperfection of the constitutional innovations of 2020 is also considered – the assignment to the Federation Council of quasi-judicial functions to terminate the powers of a number of categories of judges for committing serious offenses.
全文:
作者简介
Mikhail Kleandrov
Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mklean@igpran.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-2483-1717
Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Chief Researcher, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
补充文件

