Email this article 
Statutory Analogy in Criminal Law: Prohibition or Permissibility
- Authors: Rublev A.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Crimean Branch, Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 88-99
- Section: Criminal law studies
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/2072-909X/article/view/364312
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909X.2025.6.88-99
- ID: 364312
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The ban on analogy when describing specific crimes in the administration of justice is considered as one of the guarantees of the principle of legality. The theoretical construct about the effectiveness of the analogy of law, which justifies the weakening of established guarantees over legal certainty, is subjected to critical analysis.
The principle of legality is contained both in the constitutional norm and in the criminal norm; therefore, it is not only a requirement of legal certainty, requiring only the possibility of prior knowledge of crimes and punishments, but also a political guarantee that a citizen cannot be subjected by a judicial body to punishments that the collective the will of the people does not accept, that is, it is a constitutional principle and a fundamental principle of criminal law.
The prohibition of analogy means that the judiciary cannot act as a legislator. Analogy is prohibited as a means of creating and expanding criminal norms, as well as increasing punishment and security measures, which is a guarantee of the administration of justice. To avoid this, the law must be written in as clear and precise a manner as possible, the author argues that the “lex stricta” imposes a certain degree of precision on the criminal law and excludes analogy in the qualification of the crime and the application of punishment.
Full Text
About the authors
Andrey G. Rublev
Crimean Branch, Russian State University of Justice named after V. M. Lebedev
Author for correspondence.
Email: andrewrublev@bk.ru
Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Public Law Disciplines Department.
Russian Federation, SimferopolReferences
- Artеmenko, I. A. Judicial precedents and legal analogies as criminal law resources in post-reform Russia. Vestnik Hakasskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. F. Katanova = Bulletin of the N. F. Katanov Khakass State University. 2015;(14):141-143. (In Russ.)
- Kursaev, A. V. The principle of inadmissibility of applying criminal law by analogy. Juridical Techniques. 2020;(14):459-466. (In Russ.)
- Tokareva, S. N. Codification of criminal law in the first years of the Soviet rule: from continuity to independence. Lex Russica. 2019;(10):154-160. (In Russ.)
- Manokhin, V. S. Some peculiarities of judicial discretion in the Russian Federation. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge. 2022;(6):45-49. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
- Geistlinger, M., Ilyutchenko, N. V. The value of the legal positions of the constitutional courts of Russia and Austria for the criminal process. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2023;19(3):55-64. (In Russ.) (LRS “ConsultantPlus”.)
- Morozov, M. V. Analogy as a way of interpretation and application of criminal law. Cand. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg; 2022. 200 p. (In Russ.)
- Babaev, M. M., Pudovochkin, Yu. E. Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022;(4):78-89. (In Russ.)
- Ershov, V. V. “Judicial law-making”: pro et contra. Pravosudie/Justice. 2020;2(1):7-35. (In Russ.)
- Kornev, A. V. Transformation of law in time and space. Pravosudie/Justice. 2023;5(3):14-32. (In Russ.)
- Kunashev, A. A. Difficulties in qualifying incitement to hatred or enmity. Ugolovnyj protsess = Criminal Proceedings. 2024;(3):72-81. (In Russ.)
- Lopashenko, N. A. The criminal law is seen as a cure for everything. Ugolovnyj protsess = Criminal Proceedings. 2023;(2): 40-47. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
