Sacrovaginopexy with combined access and mesh-vaginopexy in the treatment of genital prolapse

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Comparative analysis of two modem methods of women’s genital prolapse treatment was carried out. Comparing close and some remote results of MESH- vaginopexy (97patients) andtransvaginal retroperitonealsacrovaginopexy with laparoscopic control (24 patients), the authors determine particular indications, advantages and expediency of the elaborated methods.

About the authors

A. A. Popov

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

S. L. Gorsky

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

G. G. Shaginyan

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

M. R. Ramazanov

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology M3 RF

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Eсо-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).