To the Question of the Interpretation of the Terms "Dose Limit" and "Radiation Accident" in the Development of New Norms of Radiation Safety
- Autores: Ryzhov S.A.1,2,3, Narkevich B.Y.1,4, Vodovatov A.V.5,6
-
Afiliações:
- Association of Medical Physicists of Russia
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology
- Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
- P.V. Ramzaev Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene
- Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
- Edição: Volume 68, Nº 5 (2023)
- Páginas: 38-43
- Seção: Radiation Safety
- URL: https://medbiosci.ru/1024-6177/article/view/363862
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-5-38-43
- ID: 363862
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
Purpose: To analyze the existing in NRB-99/2009 and proposed in the journal “Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety” interpretations of the terms “dose limit” and “radiation accident” when developing a new version of this regulatory document.
Material and methods: The features of the interpretation of these terms are considered both in NRB-99/2009 and in a number of domestic and international reference books and glossaries on radiation safety, including proposals published in No. 4 of the journal “Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety” for 2023.
Results: The interpretation of the numerical values of the dose limits proposed in the indicated journal seems to be poorly substantiated, while their traditional interpretation remains more preferable. The addition of the concept of a radiation accident with the term “emergency” with its own explanation by the authors of the article contradicts the recommendations of the IAEA. The necessity of taking into account the specifics of radiation accidents in medicine when interpreting the term “radiation accident” is shown.
Conclusions: 1. There is no need to revise the traditional interpretation of the numerical values of dose limits. 2. It is expedient to replace the wording of the concept of a radiation accident existing in NRB-99/2009 with the wording of the same concept from the IAEA glossary on radiation safety. 3. Taking into account the need for a correct interpretation of the concept of a radiation accident in medicine, the terms “radiation incident”, “unintentional (accidental) medical exposure” and “radiation accident” with their corresponding interpretations should be added to the new version of the NRB.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
S. Ryzhov
Association of Medical Physicists of Russia; Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology; Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies
Email: narvik@yandex.ru
Moscow; Moscow; Moscow
B. Narkevich
Association of Medical Physicists of Russia; N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: narvik@yandex.ru
Moscow; Moscow
A. Vodovatov
P.V. Ramzaev Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: narvik@yandex.ru
Saint-Petersburg; Saint-Petersburg
Bibliografia
- Симаков А.В., Клочков В.Н., Абрамов Ю.В. Обоснование предложений к новым нормам радиационной безопасности // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. 2023. Т.68, № 4. С. 20–23.
- СанПиН 2.6.1.2523-09. Нормы радиационной безопасности НРБ-99/2009. М.: Роспотребнадзор. 2009.
- Руководство P 2.2.2006 – 05. Руководство по гигиенической оценке факторов рабочей среды и трудового процесса. Критерии и классификация условий труда. М.: Минтруд. 2005.
- Барковский А.Н., Ахматдинов Р.Р., Библин А.М. и др. Облучение персонала и населения зон наблюдения радиационных объектов в 2021 году. Радиационная гигиена. 2022. Т.15, № 4. С. 106-121.https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-4-106-121.
- Результаты радиационно-гигиенической паспортизации в Российской Федерации за 2021 год (радиационно-гигиенический паспорт Российской Федерации). М.: Федеральный центр гигиены и эпидемиологии Роспотребнадзора,2020.
- Nobuyuki Hamada, Yuki Fujimichi. Classification of Radiation Effects for Dose Limitation Purposes: History, Current Situation and Future Prospects // J. Radiat. Res. 2014. V.55, No. 4. P. 629-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru019.
- ICRP. Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Optimization of Radiation Protection. ICRP Publication 37 // Ann. ICRP. 1983. V.10, No. 2-3.
- Глоссарий МАГАТЭ по вопросам безопасности. STI/PUB/1830. МАГАТЭ, Вена. 2023.
- IAEA. Nuclear Safety and Security Glossary. IAEA: Vienna, 2022. ISBN 978–92–0–141122–8.
- Глоссарий терминов, аббревиатур и понятий по медицинской радиологии, медицинской физике и радиационной безопасности. Составители: Наркевич Б.Я., Ратнер Т.Г., Рыжов С.А., Моисеев А.Н. М.: Изд. АМФР, 2022.
- Рыжов С.А. Радиационные аварии и ошибки в медицине. Термины и определения // Медицинская физика. 2019. № 1. С. 73–90.
- IAEA Safety Standards Series. No. GSR Part 3. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources. STI/PUB/1578. IAEA: Vienna, 2014.
- Lessons Learned from Accidental Exposures in Radiotherapy. STI/PUB/1084. IAEA: Vienna, 2000.
- Радиационная защита в медицине. Публикация 105 МКРЗ. СПб., 2011.
- Vodovatov A.V., Ryzhov S.A., Chipiga L.A., et al. Perspective Approaches to Classification of Radiation Accidents in Radiology on the Example of Computed Tomography. AIP Conference Proceedings 2356, 020028. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053135.
Arquivos suplementares
